EVE Search - Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 17 post(s)
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 204	Posted - 2016.03.23 09:54:24 - [1] - Quote Do FAXes really need 6 high slots? You cannot fit them all reliably with remote assistance modules without sacrificing local tank which was not the case with current triage carriers. I would prefer one of their high slots moved to either a mid or low. They also need a decrease in scale as you currently cannot see the entirety of their hull in station hangar. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 204	Posted - 2016.03.23 12:12:09 - [2] - Quote Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Luscius Uta wrote: Do FAXes really need 6 high slots? You cannot fit them all reliably with remote assistance modules without sacrificing local tank which was not the case with current triage carriers. I would prefer one of their high slots moved to either a mid or low. They also need a decrease in scale as you currently cannot see the entirety of their hull in station hangar. I can get them all full easily of the gal/minm and only with miner sacrifice on the amarr caldari did need some fitting mods however. Also the carriers stats have not been reballances to accommodate the new changes (like how their thp has not been lowered) so CPU and PG may be changing Not to mention the compact rr mods ate not even seeded yet Admittedly I tried only with Apostle since it's the only one I can fly, and noticed it doesn't have enough PG to fit 4+1 remote modules and 2 local reppers. Though I suppose that CCP is mimicking logistics cruisers who typically need an ACR rig to be fit properly. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 204	Posted - 2016.03.24 07:58:26 - [3] - Quote Yesterday I warped to CA1 in a heavily tanked Phobos, and got popped almost instantly by a GTFO doomsday. My pod was destroyed as well. Broken much? Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 204	Posted - 2016.03.30 08:13:53 - [4] - Quote I noticed that the Capital Ancillary Shield Booster doesn't even require Capital Shield Operation skill, which is not consistent with other capital modules. Also, the T2 25m plate requires only Hull Upgrades I, which in combination with the former issue leads me to believe that skill requirements of new capital modules aren't well thought of or balanced. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 204	Posted - 2016.03.30 12:30:32 - [5] - Quote Kieron VonDeux wrote: Luscius Uta wrote: I noticed that the Capital Ancillary Shield Booster doesn't even require Capital Shield Operation skill, which is not consistent with other capital modules. Also, the T2 25m plate requires only Hull Upgrades I, which in combination with the former issue leads me to believe that skill requirements of new capital modules aren't well thought of or balanced. Placeholder requirements are not release requirements. Are you implying they will change? Because I would like to know them in advance, so I can decide should I postpone my remap or not. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 204	Posted - 2016.04.06 07:52:31 - [6] - Quote After trying new fighter system for the first time yesterday in a mass test, I can say that the interface confused me a bit. First, there is no indication of what target my fighters are currently shooting (there should be an icon below the selected target, like there is with weapons and drones). Then I would like to know how far they are from selected target, so I can know should I turn on their microwarpdrives or not. And at one moment, fighter interface moved from bottom center of the screen to top left and it took me a bit to find the button to bring in back since it was hidden under neocom. I'm also not enjoying the fact that I had to train new skills to use fighters I could use before. Yes I know that skills are seeded and that we have enough time to train them, but it's still a kick in the nutts for the people who aren't on a good remap in respect to drone skills. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 209	Posted - 2016.04.13 06:52:09 - [7] - Quote Do capital neuts have undocumented reduced effectiveness on ships with signature radius below 8000 m? If not, what their signature radius attribute means? And if yes, it'll mean people will still fit heavy neuts to get rid of stuff like HICs. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 209	Posted - 2016.04.13 07:10:13 - [8] - Quote Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Luscius Uta wrote: Do capital neuts have undocumented reduced effectiveness on ships with signature radius below 8000 m? If not, what their signature radius attribute means? And if yes, it'll mean people will still fit heavy neuts to get rid of stuff like HICs. What do you mean undocumented? But yes they have a reduced effectiveness the math works the same as with bombs They are not supposed to replace heavy nuets on capitals they are just a new nuet meant to be used against capitals I mean there's nothing in the module description that implies what the purpose of new signature radius attribute is. Not sure if someone explained it in forum posts previously though, but I haven't read every forum post ever. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 209	Posted - 2016.04.13 07:33:22 - [9] - Quote Because it's a new stat that wasn't associated with this type of module, and why is there no signature radius factor for heavy and medium neuts as well? Doesn't seem only incomprehensive but inconsistent as well. Workarounds are not bugfixes.
Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 211	Posted - 2016.04.27 09:45:04 - [10] - Quote Today I discovered that a burst projector can be activated mid-warp. I somehow doubt this is intentional. Workarounds are not bugfixes.

Luscius Uta Anomalous Existence Low-Class 212	Posted - 2016.05.02 07:13:57 - [11] - Quote Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Luscius Uta wrote: Kieron VonDeux wrote: Luscius Uta wrote: I noticed that the Capital Ancillary Shield Booster doesn't even require Capital Shield Operation skill, which is not consistent with other capital modules. Also, the T2 25m plate requires only Hull Upgrades I, which in combination with the former issue leads me to believe that skill requirements of new capital modules aren't well thought of or balanced. Placeholder requirements are not release requirements. Are you implying they will change? Because I would like to know them in advance, so I can decide should I postpone my remap or not. no ccp is just going to leave the T2 plate at hull upgrades I And that's what they indeed did! Workarounds are not bugfixes.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.